Dear Naresh,
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has requested political asylum from Ecuador. [1]
British courts recently rejected Assange’s appeal against extradition to Sweden. Assange has good reason to fear extradition to Sweden: many believe it likely that Sweden would extradite Assange to the United States to face charges under the Espionage Act of 1917 for his role in publishing leaked U.S. diplomatic cables, charges that could carry the death penalty. The treatment of Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier accused of providing U.S. diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks, suggests the treatment that Assange might expect in U.S. government custody. Manning has been subjected to repeated and prolonged solitary confinement, harassment by guards, and humiliation such as being forced to strip naked and stand at attention outside his cell.
If the U.S. government succeeds in prosecuting Assange under the Espionage Act, it will likely intimidate future potential whistleblowers, making it harder to reveal important secrets about U.S. foreign policy in the future—and making it harder to reform U.S. foreign policy.
Will you join us in urging President Correa to grant Julian Assange's request for political asylum?
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/assange-asylum
Glenn Greenwald writes today in the Guardian [2]:
If one asks current or former WikiLeaks associates what their greatest fear is, almost none cites prosecution by their own country. Most trust their own nation's justice system to recognize that they have committed no crime. The primary fear is being turned over to the US. That is the crucial context for understanding Julian Assange's 16-month fight to avoid extradition to Sweden, a fight that led him to seek asylum, Tuesday, in the London Embassy of Ecuador.As Greenwald notes:
The evidence that the US seeks to prosecute and extradite Assange is substantial. There is no question that the Obama justice department has convened an active grand jury to investigate whether WikiLeaks violated the draconian Espionage Act of 1917. Key senators from President Obama's party, including Senate intelligence committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, have publicly called for his prosecution under that statute. A leaked email from the security firm Stratfor – hardly a dispositive source, but still probative – indicated that a sealed indictment has already been obtained against him. Prominent American figures in both parties have demanded Assange's lifelong imprisonment, called him a terrorist, and even advocated his assassination.
Assange's fear of ending up in the clutches of the US is plainly rational and well-grounded. One need only look at the treatment over the last decade of foreign nationals accused of harming American national security to know that's true; such individuals are still routinely imprisoned for lengthy periods without any charges or due process. Or consider the treatment of Bradley Manning, accused of leaking to WikiLeaks: a formal UN investigation found that his pre-trial conditions of severe solitary confinement were 'cruel, inhuman and degrading', and he now faces capital charges of aiding al-Qaida.WikiLeaks has made a tremendous contribution to exposing U.S. foreign policy to public scrutiny. The importance of transparency and public information to reforming U.S. foreign policy cannot be overstated. Recently, Just Foreign Policy worked with the offices of Rep. Dennis Kucinich and Rep. John Conyers to support a letter [3] signed by 26 Members of Congress [4] to President Obama pressing the Administration to disclose more information about its drone strike policy, particularly concerning civilian casualties and so-called "signature strikes" that target unknown people based on (often faulty) intelligence of suspicious activity. Polls have suggested that the drone strike policy is popular in the U.S., but the popularity in the U.S. stems from ignorance: the American people don't know what they are supporting, because the reality of the policy has been hidden from public scrutiny. That's why it's so important that information about U.S. foreign policy be made public.
Therefore—in addition to our concern for Assange's individual human rights—people who are working to reform U.S. foreign policy have a big stake in what happens in the Julian Assange/WikiLeaks case. If the U.S. government succeeds in intimidating whistleblowers, it will be harder to reveal information about U.S. foreign policy in the future, and therefore it will be harder to reform U.S. foreign policy. That's why it's so important for President Correa—who has legitimate reason to be concerned about possible retaliation [5] from the United States—to hear from Americans urging that he grant Julian Assange's request for political asylum.
Please add your voice by signing our petition to President Correa here:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/act/assange-asylum
Thank you for all you do to help bring about a more just foreign policy,
Robert Naiman, Chelsea Mozen, Sarah Burns and Megan Iorio
Just Foreign Policy
Please support our work. Donate for a Just Foreign Policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate
References:
1. "Assange asks Ecuador for asylum," Glenn Greenwald, Salon, June 19, 2012, http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/assange_asks_ecuador_for_asylum/singleton/
2. "Julian Assange's right to asylum," Glenn Greenwald, June 20, 2012, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/20/julian-assange-right-asylum
3. "Obama’s ‘kill list’ is unchecked presidential power," Katrina vanden Heuvel, Washington Post, June 12, http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamas-kill-list-is-unchecked-presidential-power/2012/06/11/gJQAHw05WV_story.html
4. "26 Members of Congress Demand Answers About Combat Drone Program," Office of Rep. Dennis Kucinich, June 13, 2012, http://kucinich.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=299392
5. "Ecuador, Chevron face off over trade deal renewal," Julian Pecquet, The Hill, June 1, 2012, http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/trade/230391-ecuador-and-chevron-face-off-over-trade-deal-renewal
Comments
Post a Comment